Archive for July, 2011

“The Motherload of Skyrim Information” or “Say Goodbye to Your Loved Ones in November”

July 25, 2011 5 comments

Following the The Motherload of Skyrim Screenshots, it’s only appropriate that I share this great post from Gameranx which details, uh, details from the French edition of the PS3 magazine about Skyrim and it’s game mechanics, features and plot.

I think it is safe to say that come the 11th of November, I will be saying goodbye to my friends and family for an indefinite period of time!

Here we go:

  • Once King of Skyrim was found dead, it sparked off a civil war
  • Quest givers can give you either more or less information regarding a quest
  • Taverns will play great role in the game since they will be locations whre players will overhear conversations, start quests, gain information and much more
  • Player can boost all perks to level 100 but can’t get all perks
  • Players will be able to cook, woodcut, mine and blacksmith
  • A settlement called Riverwood can be found in game
  • Some weapons will have concealed effects as long you don’t try them yourself
  • Magnetism will allow you to prevent friendly fire in combat
  • Each settlement will provide an unique feel
  • Wind will effect water stream
  • Dragon encounters won’t be scripted
  • One of the cities of Skyrim will be dedicated to the Dunmer while Haafingar will be the largest port available in game
  • Dwemer Ruins will be available in Skyrim
  • Weather effects will be a part of the game
  • Equipment can be repaired
  • Player can break into NPC houses or silently stalk them
  • Block mechanism can’t be used in combat as long player has a spell equipped to one of his character hands
  • Various different colors, rituals and other features will be added to each of the Nord factions available in game
  • Archers can hold their breath to boost accuracy
  • Ice Trap freezes an enemy when he walks over trap similar to WoW’s Ice Trap
  • Circle of Protection spell pushes surrounding enemies from player
  • Detect Life allows player to detect life in his vicinity most likely similar to tracking spells of hunter class in WoW
  • Fury makes enemies go berserk and fight each other
Categories: Skyrim, Teasers

“Rift: Who Wants to be my Friend?” or “You Want That Ember Steed or Not?”

July 22, 2011 4 comments

Alright, so Trion has rolled out a recruit-a-friend program for early adopters (founders) of Rift, and you can gift a free copy to one of your friends, and Ascend them.

For every friend you gift, you get Courage, a (vanity?) pet, then a spiffy hat for the second, and a kick-ass mount called the Ember Steed for your third. You can find additional details here.

So: who wants to be my friend?

Categories: Rift

“The Motherload of Skyrim Screenshots” or “Most Anticipated Game o- *drool*”

July 22, 2011 6 comments

Courtesy of Attack of the Fanboy, here is a collection of a ton of screenshots from the latest Elder Scrolls title: Skyrim. Considering I played Oblivion and Morrowind more hours than I thought were humanly possible to spend in one game, I am guessing Skyrim will be the end of me.

The following two screenshots are the latest ones, as pointed out to me via this tweet, the gallery below is all the images  could find up to now.

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

Categories: Skyrim, Teasers

“Melmoth Strikes Again” or “Level 45 Hunters are Nubs”

July 21, 2011 2 comments

Read this post.

Then read the following comment (incidentally also the first response to said post).

“Instance Control. Champion Heavy Six Zero. Requesting permission to dungeon run.”

“Roger Champion Heavy Six Zero. Please change your character level to six five and then proceed on instance two three.”

“Level six five, and instance two three. Thank you. Champion Heavy Six Zero”

“Champion Heavy Six Zero, be advised you have a Guardian and Minstrel ahead of you at a level of six five, please maintain separation and do not attempt to join their formation.”

“Roger. We have them in sight, will maintain separation. Champion Heavy Six Zero.”

“Instance Control. Hunter Medium Four Five. Requesting permission to join formation.”

“Ah ha ha ha ha ha ha Hunter Medium Four Five. Ah ha ha.”

Categories: World of Warcraft

Article of the Week: “Anisotropic Filtering? Anti-Aliasing? Tessellation?” or “Here is What Those Terms Mean!”

July 20, 2011 Leave a comment

I came across this useful little post from the folks over at a while back, and it had been rotting in my temporary bookmarks folder for some time.

If you have ever struggled with terms like anisotropic filtering, anti-aliasing or shader models while tweaking the graphical settings mid-game, this post is a great beginner’s guide to what these terms mean. In short:

Anisotropic Filtering

All modern games use mip-mapping, which renders textures farther away at lower resolutions to help frame-rates, anisotropic filtering helps reduce the blatancy of the visible between the hi-res texture close to you, and the lo-res texture further away.


Ever notice how slanted lines in graphics can seem jagged and pixelated. A higher multiplier in anti-aliasing helps reduce this jagged edge and renders a smoother line.

High Dynamic Range Lighting

HDR lighting increases the level of brightness rendered, so the game world presents it’s varying contrasts a bit better, as would occur naturally to the naked eye.

Shader Model

Shader model the shading language used to program shaders. It is constantly evolving and older cards may not support all the features of the shader model being used by the latest game.


Think of this as anisotropic filtering, but for polygons. Polygons closer to the player are rendered with high details (the count normally remains the same), whereas polygons much farther are rendered at a much lower detail-level.

Source: Five Important PC Gaming Terms Explained

Categories: Article of the Week

Played Lately: “Witcher 2: Pros and Cons” or “Witcher 2’s Divergent Chapters”

July 18, 2011 6 comments

With a severe lack of MMOs in my life, I am finding my guilty gaming pleasures in several multiplayer co-op and single-player titles these days. I wait anxiously for the day new-generation MMOs like Guild Wars 2 and The Secret World come out, but until then, I just can’t bring myself to engage in the same old cyclical redundancy that is the bane of the contemporary MMO experience.

My last post detailed the multiplayer co-op games I have been playing of late. This post details the single-player titles that have kept me occupied

Witcher 2: Pros and Cons

The Witcher 2 is simultaneously one of the most amazing and annoying games ever build in the history of computer gaming.

On the positive side, it is a complete RPG experience, rich with lore, dripping with ambiance and executed with style in a lush, beautifully crafted world. The lore is especially well-planned, originally based off of the books of polish author Andrzej Sapkowski, and details a fantastical kingdom with geopolitical tensions, royal assassinations, political espionage, magic, dragons and civil war in the lands. The game world has perhaps the best-looking environments I have seen to date in a video game. Lush foliage, towering castles, painstakingly detailed ruins and winding dungeons seamlessly blend together to create one of the most visually rewarding experiences I have had in a virtual world. The combat system, though initially baffling, can vary dramatically depending on your specialization, and can prove to be incredibly rewarding and challenging.

The game is not without its flaws. The combat starts very tough, with no clear direction as to what you’re supposed to do or how you are supposed to fight. Over the course of the game you actually become powerful enough to decimate anything in your path regardless of size, health, disposition or strength. Read that again. The combat starts really tough, and gets really easy. That’s dumb. The inventory management was a colossal pain in the ass. You only have 300 units of items you can carry. Given that the game throws cloth and leather and creature parts, and swords, and axes and pikes, and war hammers, and random junk, and herbs, and quest items, and beast trophies, and elemental stones and diamond dust and silver ore and iron ore and timber and the kitchen sink (to name maybe 1% of everything there is to pick up in the world), you run out of inventory space quite quickly. And god help you if you run out of space in the middle of a dungeon crawl, because the game will encumber and slow you down to a crawl. Add to this the fact that you will pick up recipes throughout the game and you never know which materials you might need later to craft that epic silver sword, piece or mail or armor kit, it can result in a very frustrating experience. The upcoming patch 1.3 promises to deal with both these issues, which is a great thing, I just wish they had done this when I was going through it myself.

Yup, that's one of the monsters you get to fight in the game.

Witcher 2’s Divergent Chapters

But Witcher 2’s greatest strength isn’t all of the fantastic gameplay elements, graphics, or mechanics that I listed above. In Witcher 2, one of the coolest things, that I only realized after reading up on it online, is that a binary choice in Chapter One completely changes the way the rest of the game plays out.

This isn’t necessarily a spoiler, but read at your own risk. The game will ask you to choose between Roethe or Iorveth during your first showdown with the Assassin of Kings. Either choice is permitted, but the game divides into two completely separate paths after you make this choice. Allow me to explain. The binary choice results in different NPCs dying, different fate of the town of Floatsam, a completely different Chapter Two and Chapter Three, including missions, NPCs, objectives, story, monsters and side-quests. Allow me to rephrase, playing the game after siding with Iroveth is a completely different lore and storyline experience from that moment onwards, than if you sided with Roethe. For example, Iorveth’s side leads you in Chapter Two to the Dwarven town of Vergen, which is preparing for an invasion by King Henselt’s armies. Whereas if you sided with Roethe, you actually play Chapter Two in King Henselt’s camp, as he prepares his advance against Vergen.

That is true choice, where your decisions matter and effectively change the entire direction and disposition of the game.

If you haven’t yet, you must play The Witcher 2: Assassins of Kings.

Categories: Lore, Review, Witcher II

Played Lately: “Magicka’s Mutually Assured Destruction” or “Borderlands Badass Co-Op”

July 15, 2011 4 comments

I am playing no MMO these days, which is odd because I started this blog as an MMO player. There are a number of reasons for why I am not playing any existing MMOs, but suffice it to say, I am just tired of the endless cycle. I am tired of never being able to “properly” impact the world for the better. I am tired of killing the same old ten rats, albeit with a new look and mechanic. I am tired of grinding. I am tired of farming. I am tired of competing for gear because having gained 85 goddamn levels means absolutely nothing in this day and age of the perpetual endgame gear grind. I am tired of all this.

I am not saying MMO’s haven’t evolved, the latest cross-realm raid pugging and Real ID grouping features from Blizzard are ground-breaking features. Eve Online set the bar for player-defined market economies and territory control very high, but suffers from its inherent complexity and that the oldest players are over 100 million skill points ahead of the competition, which, to say the least, is ridiculous. This is but two of many example.

I am looking for the second wave of MMO ingenuity. I am looking for the world-impacting mechanics of Guild Wars 2. I am looking for the level-less scope of the Secret World. I am waiting for light-sabers. And in the meantime, I am, keeping myself busy with a host of other quality multiplayer games, that are just not as massive.

Magicka’s Mutually Assured Destruction

I am playing Magicka these days with three of my friends, and it is a treat to play. There are no levels, no skill points, no game-breaking gear (there is gear), no additional spells or abilities to learn. Everyone starts off on the same foot and finds their preferred way to play. There are eight spells in the game, and five spell slots. You can mix and match the skills in Magicka in those five slots (or less, if you are pressed for time) to create unique spell-combinations. You can cast Fire with Healing to simultaneously heal and dry yourself. You can cast frost to freeze a water surface to walk across. You can sling earthen boulders, or add a dash of Fire to hurl fireballs. You are only held back by your imagination for how you decide to take on an obstacle.

Then you add three more players, and it gets a lot more fun.

There is friendly fire in Magicka. This means that if you are casting a death ray of Arcane energy, an ally who walks across that beam will also be instantly zapped. Given that all spells are both area effect, conical directional, and focused, the possibility of getting hit by an ally’s firepower gets multiplied astronomically. Battles are careful strategic endeavors, because your enemies will come at you from all directions and shooting any combinations of magical energies at them imply you have to ensure your allies are not caught in the spells’ wake. This adds incredible depth and scale to an already exciting game, and results in some of the funniest, and at times frustrating moments in my recent gaming history.

Borderlands Badass Co-Op

I played Borderlands a while back with a friend on the Xbox, but we got bored after about 15 levels. Partially because the vertically split-screen was headache inducing, and partly because I am not used to playing shooters on an Xbox controller. Two years later, Steam decides to have a massive sale on a Borderlands 4-pack. Two of my friends purchase it, and off we go, into the world of Pandora, in search of the 17+ million weapons the game has to offer.

It occurred to me very shortly after playing it with two other players that Borderlands’ Pandora is a cruel, gruesome and tough world. Enemies got tougher, tougher enemies got impossible and we learned what it was like to play a cooperative shooter where your combined abilities can result in the difference between life and death. It is not as intense, nor as teamwork dependent as Left 4 Dead but it does require skill, and planning and watching each others’ backs through the tougher moments.

The bottomline is that Borderlands, even two years after release, has turned out to be one hell of a game, especially when played with several players cooperatively.

Next post: The single-player games that are keeping me busy till a better MMO comes out.

Categories: Borderlands

“Two Simple Questions” or “Of Weights and Subtitles”

July 1, 2011 1 comment

Question One: Is using zero-weight mods cheating?

I have been playing Witcher II for the last month or so. The game isn’t without a plethora of inherent flaws, but thus far it has been one of the most comprehensively enjoyable experiences I have had with a title.

One thing that really threw me off about Witcher II was the sheer amount of, well, stuff that you carry. You can only carry up to 300 ‘units’ of weight, and it fills up fast. There are all kinds of materials in the world to build all manner of armor, weaponry (read: swords), runes, crafting materials, traps, snares, bombs, potions and whatnot. To further exacerbate the problem, you never know what you might find around the bend that requires the one thing that you sold to the vendor, so you end up carrying insane volumes of materials. Soon I found myself making multiple trips from a questing area back to a vendor in town just to make room for me to pick up additional stuff.

I tried, valiantly I might add, to resist the urge, but it was too much in the end. I installed a zero-weight mod and the game was immediately and infinitely much more enjoyable. But the question remains: since this wasn’t a part of the original game mechanics, is it cheating?

Question Two: Why do we use the most cliched secondary titles for our video games?

Retribution. Absolution. Ascension. Revelation. Masturbation. Well maybe not that one. Revenge of the <insert character here>. Return of the <insert character here>.

Are we really that out of ideas for secondary titles? Personally I would rather have you call it <Insert Title Here> 2, than <Insert Title Here>: Revelations. There are a few that seem to have been able to break that pattern, such as Battlefield: Bad Company, and Assassin’s Creed: Brotherhood (take that one with a grain of salt, the next one is called Assassin’s Creed: Revelations). Why must we succumb to this tepid practice?!?